EFEKTIVITAS METODE INQUIRY LEARNING TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPA PADA TEMA ENERGI DAN PERUBAHANNYA

Authors

  • Imroatik Zahrotul Khoiriyah Universitas Islam Lamongan
  • Silviana Nur Faizah Universitas Islam Lamongan
  • Minahul Mubin Universitas Islam Lamongan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30736/atl.v3i2.204

Keywords:

Inquiry Learning Method, Learning Outcomes, Science.

Abstract

Learning method is a way that is taken or used by the teacher to deliver a learning material in an effort to achieve the goals of a learning. Whereas lPA is one of the lessons that must involve students directly with the implementation of practicums to improve students' skills. In the process of learning science at SDN Tlogoagung, researchers found that learning outcomes were still low, the average score was 60% lower than the specified KKM, which was 75. This was possible because of the conventional learning process. The focus of the research that will be discussed in this study is about how the effectiveness of the inquiry learning method for learning outcomes and the skills of the science learning process in the matter of energy and its changes. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the method of inquiry learning on learning outcomes and the skills of the science learning process on energy matter and its changes. The method used in this study is an experimental method using nonequivalent control group design. Data collection techniques used were interviews, tests, observation sheets and documentation. While the data analysis used is the validity test, reliability test, normality test, homogeneity test, assessment of the test, mean, achievement of learning outcomes, N-Gain, observation of basic process skills, and hypothesis testing using Independent samples t-test. From the results of the study it is known that the use of inquiry learning methods seen from the results of learning between the experimental class with the control class, while the average value of the experimental class post test is 87 while the average value of the control class post test is 79. Based on the results of hypothesis testing indicates that the value sig (2 tailed) smaller than 0.05 so Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. This means that the inquiry learning method is effective on learning outcomes and the skills of the science learning process on energy matter and its changes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amalia Sapriati. (2014). Pembelajaran IPA di SD. Tanggerang Selatan: Universitas Terbuka.

Asra, S. dan. (2007). Metode Pembelajaran. Bandung: CV Wacana Prima.

Devina Cici Rahmawati. (2015). Pengaruh penggunaan model pembelajaran inquiry learning terhadap hasil belajar IPA pada materi perubahan wujud benda siswa kelas III SDN Temas 01 Kota Batu. Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

Irianto, A. (2008). Statistik Konsep dasar dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Mubin, S. N. F. dan M. (2018). Pengaruh Modul Tematik Berbasis Integrasi Islam dan Sainspada tema Energi dan Perubahannya Terhadap hasil Belajar Siswa MI Murni Sunan Drajat Lamongan. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 3(2), 72–76.

Sanjaya, W. (2018). Perencanaan dan desain system pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana.

Sudjana, N. (2014). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar (VI). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Susanto, A. (2013). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Syofrianida, S. (2018). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Parama Ilmu.

Tangkas, L. M. (2012). Pengaruh Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Terbimbing Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Kelas X SMAN 3 Amlapura. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.

Umar Tirtarahardja dan La Sulo. (2005). Pengantar Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Downloads

PlumX Metrics

Published

2019-09-01

How to Cite

Khoiriyah, I. Z., Faizah, S. N., & Mubin, M. (2019). EFEKTIVITAS METODE INQUIRY LEARNING TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPA PADA TEMA ENERGI DAN PERUBAHANNYA. At-Thullab : Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 3(2), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.30736/atl.v3i2.204

Most read articles by the same author(s)